novels anyone??

yea, its been ancient since my last post. the truth is, i don't even know what to blab about in here. i'm not really like my friends who constantly post interesting post regularly. pardon me for that though. and now, i reaalllllllyyy wanted to post something. lol.

have u guys ever read any sort of novels? u should read u know? its the food and supplement for your mind. its a healthy sort of diet to ur mind. but all of it comes down to what TYPE of novels are u actually reading? but then again, u still read so bravo to u. hehe. anyway, i wanted to talk about the assignment that i've got from Mr. Mazlan, our Novels and Short Stories lecturer. he is a one interesting man, that guy is. hah, but then his class is always interesting and fun even though its our first morning class. he gave us a task of finding a social novel that matches the criteria that he had told us. yea well. at first i thought "hmm, mcm mna la nak cari nih? ish2, susah jgk nih." but then, when i had started the search on the suitable novel, dang!! my 1st choice novel is the most common novel that many of my classmates will choose. who in the world does not even know about Jodi Picoult eh? they must be living under the shell if they don't. after about an hour of painstakingly combing through all of the fiction and literary fiction section at MPH, i finally found it. with the help of shafeena azly of course. nasib baik cukup kredit for calling her and asking on her opinion. hehe. the title is called a gate at the stairs by Lorrie Moore. i do hope Mr. Mazlan approved this novel and i sure do hope that no one will choose the same novel as i am.

- a very boring composition from a bored gurl-

An actress? hmm, of course whenever i thought of one, the name Emma Watson will immediately come to mind. the name brings a lot of memories to my mind every time i hears it. She's the same age as me but she achieved success in a very young age. i respect her. really i do. even tough she's an actress, she's smart, very level-headed to say the least and she's not really your typical type of actress gone to rehab type. she's not like Lyndsay, or Britney, or any other young Hollywood stars who had lost their way in what is wrong and what is right. virtues are so hard to come by in a young actress these days.

sure, we have the oh-so-innocent looking actresses in Disney or any other children production, but whenever they wanna shed the Disney kid's look, they would go the extreme. they would be making a really matured video wearing revealing clothes that are really revealing just to say or show to the world that they are indeed an adult or matured enough. that is just shallow. you could always show or prove to the world that you are matured or and adult by showing your intelligence, your virtues, and your natural beauty to say the least.

no matter if you are a rich heiress, a daughter of a very famous rock star, or a daughter to a carpenter, you are the same. A girl. A woman. no need to scantily clad in a piece of a scrap u called dress. if u possessed a natural beauty, whatever u wear -an overall, an ancient dress from ur great-grandmother or something hideous- will show ur true beauty. if u only dressed to kill. literally to kill a man's heart, why not opt to a more logical approach? challenge his intellect. u should know that u have a ground to stand to. do not let anybody control you. do not let the view of the public to control it. u have ur own life. ur life is ur territory. hmm. mayB i should stop 4 now. how about i share with u my most treasured autograph of Emma Watson? i received it during my studies in MJSC. i love it.

just a mere thought of harry potter. :D

THREETURNSSHOULDDOIT:

WHEN HARRY MET RON.

Like a proud father, David Heyman, the producer of the Harry Potter films, reached for a box of photographs when a visitor asked him about the young stars of the history-making franchise.

“They are not my own children, obviously, but they are like nephews and nieces or perhaps godchildren, and I feel really protective of them,” Heyman said as he sat in his office at the converted aviation factory here that serves as the movie set for the Potter series.

“Here, look at this one — this is a photo taken the day the boys met. No one’s really seen this before. They were taking a little walk together to get know one another…”

The black-and-white snapshot showed Potter stars Daniel Radcliffe and Rupert Grint as chubby-cheeked adolescents strolling side by side, their eyes cast down to their shadows. Heyman took the photo in 2000.